For articles and re -posting in social networks often start art issues. 282 of Russia's Penal Code (extremism). This was told in an interview with RT by MKA's lawyer “Klish and Partners” Vitaly Bogomolov. He also explained other articles and reposts on social networks that could threaten a criminal case.
From practice for articles and reposts in social networks, they often start art issues. The delegates.
According to him, the second most popular is art. 319 of the Penal Code – a public offend of a representative of the government.
If in publishing, commenting or reposting, it is clear that we are talking about a specific police officer, prosecutor or police officer in the performance of official tasks, then the insults for him must follow this article.
Many people have heard about art. 148 of the Penal Code (insulting the feelings of the believers), he added.
Caricatural images, satirical memes, negative videos, declaration of sacred symbols or events can become a reason for a criminal case. At the same time, not only the law enforcement agencies, but also citizens believe their feelings are offended, the lawyer said.
By the way, the actions of this article also apply to those who are offending or negatively expressing to the atheists, he emphasized.
Article 354.1 of the Penal Code stipulates penalties for the recovery of fascism. The standard is given to protect the historical memories and the ban on the Nazi criminal, but the practice of using it is much wider. At the same time, the subjective attitude of the author of The Post (for AI or against AI) is not important, he explained Bogomolov.
It is noted that according to art. 128.1 of the Penal Code (slander) stipulating criminal liability for the distribution of false information, discredit the honor and dignity of others.
Social networks have long been a foundation to clarify relationships. But false information is likely to harm the reputation of another citizen that is eligible to slander, the lawyer explains.
In addition, according to him, violating the inviolable of private life (Article 137 of the Penal Code) on social networks is not uncommon.
For this, the fine of up to 200,000 rubles or the maximum penalty is facing – two years in prison. The position without the consent of personal photos, letters or intimate videos is a direct violation of the law, the expert noted.
He also mentioned hacking social networks.
The efforts to hack other people's pages are eligible to illegally access to computer information (Article 272 of the Penal Code). The responsibility occurs even if the victim's data is assigned under the fictional name. At the request of the investigation, the government of social networks transmits technical information allows us to determine a definite copy.
Earlier, the head of the Law Department of the University of Law, Professor Vadim Vinogradov, said in an interview with RT that the virtual space of the conversations in the house, although it was considered by many people as an unofficial communication area, under the complete control of Russian law.
